The Big Debate!

Description

*Content is currently under edit.

There is an active global debate presently surrounding the children.  When an unresolved debate interferes with their wonder years, I take up great issue with it, especially when their health and safety is put in jeopardy; and so, I chose to become the kids’ Collective Advocate for a time and to attempt to win their safety, the sort already written into child protection and safeguarding legislation.

I am a fully qualified primary school teacher, I graduated first in my class at university and broke the standing record for the final examination, which was the only examination.  I am qualified to join this debate, fully qualified.  My professional instincts responded within a week of examining TQIA+ YouTube content and related articles/research.

After writing, Mini-Manifesto for Change: TQIA+ Demographic, Let’s Talk About The Children, terror drove me towards the continuation of the debate, despite having no standing opponent.  I debated with thin air, right up until the point that I knew I’d won something, safety for the kids and probably for teenagers too, within The Education Sector, that is.  

After careful continued analysis and professional deliberation, I labelled the expansive mind assault for what it is, The Developmental Interference/Molestation Network.  Before you freak out at the word, molestation, take in the word’s full legal meaning, as referenced from Lexis Nexis, a leading global provider of legal and regulatory intelligence:

“Molestation involves any form of physical, sexual or psychological molestation or harassment that has a serious impact on the health and well-being of the applicant. Violence is not a prerequisite. A positive intent to molest does not need to be established nor does there need to be some direct interaction between the respondent and the applicant or child. It is sufficient if the conduct is deliberate and that it has the consequence of causing or being likely to cause distress or harassment to the applicant or a child.”

After naming ‘The Network’, I continued to debate into thin air, noting that the public would require a strong justification for such a professional and deliberate choice.  Once that chapter was won, I invited anyone who wanted to change the network name to meet me in a court of law, because it is what it is, and the title confronts the realities of the highly impactful and harmful open debate.  Lots of people have been scared, parents have been rage-filled, and I listened, before responding as that primary school teacher I once was (the one I hope never to be again, sorry guys, I chose to have a life). 

I have identified a global threat to child health and safety and communicated my grave concerns upwards, hoping that those with the power to shield the kids, will.  That is what I did.  I have said my piece, both publicly and in private, leaving the more confrontational data for a court of law.  I will not comment on the situation ever again, not unless the situation re-enters the classroom once it is predictably expelled.

As a final note, a wake-up call even, know this, an active debate should never impact every child’s life, never, it is a terribly unsafe thing to be happening.  Furthermore, inclusive it is not.  When inclusion is contemplated as a QUALIFIED teacher, one comes to fathom that what is safe for one, it might not be safe for all, but that what is safe for all, will forever be safe for one.  There are a few simple caveats, but that is the start of a completely different debate.

Included with purchase:
– Mini-Manifesto for Change: TQIA+ Demographic, Let’s Talk About The Children.
– Additional Attachments, an expanded standing re. The Big Debate!
– A Note to The LGB Community.
– Education resource packs for parents to use with THEIR children, they will come to act as a child-defence strategy within the home.
– ‘Thinking Points’, a collection of 44 posters.